Is Liriano Really Available?

In today’s Star Tribune, Joe Christensen wrote about how the Twins may very well consider trading away Francisco Liriano. This has angered quite a few of my fellow bloggers and I wouldn’t be surprised to see other Liriano posts sprout up over the next day.

Looking at it from the Twins point of view, this rumor is believable. The team seemingly disregards sabermetrics in favor of more contemporary statistics and scouting, and this is likely what they see in Liriano: Good strikeout pitcher, but appears to lack confidence at times and cannot pitch deep into games like a pitcher of his ability should, and he’s still an injury risk. Another thing is that despite his dominance in 2010, he still managed an ERA only slightly lower (3.62) than his 2008 ERA (3.91), the first year after his Tommy John surgery. Similar ERAs, but he was a different (and worse) pitcher back then.

However, Liriano is the best starting pitcher the Twins have had since Johan Santana. A complaint may be that he didn’t pitch deep into games last year, but strikeout pitchers tend to run up high pitch counts early. His .331 BABIP and 2.66 FIP (compared to his 3.62 ERA) suggest he had some bad luck last season. He is not only the best pitcher on the Twins roster, he’s also one of the best in the league, period.

GM Bill Smith has had some better luck lately in trades and free agent acquisitions, but we still cannot forget the Santana, Garza/Young, and Hardy/Hoey trades. I think what worries me most about losing Liriano is the possibility of once again receiving a lackluster group of players in return.

However, we need to remember that this is only a rumor to this point, no matter how much confirmation we receive about the Twins’ interest. While dealing a starter would free up some space in the rotation, the Twins could always use the extra arms. Kevin Slowey, and Scott Baker have all had injuries in recent years, and no one’s going to forget Pavano’s Yankee years. I have to think that several people in the Twins front office are smart enough to recognize that trading Liriano away would be a mistake.


One Response to “Is Liriano Really Available?”

  1. Josh Says:

    This appears to be yet another situation in which the Twins illustrate their complete stubborn attitude toward advanced statistics and lack of understanding toward player value.

    I’d say the most difficult positions to adequately fill in baseball are shortstop, catcher, centerfield and power pitchers with ace potential. The Twins have continuously shown they undervalue these positions. They’ve traded two power pitchers in Santana and Garza for weak pitching prospects, a no-offense centerfielder and a promising corner outfielder (which are a dime a dozen). They traded a strong defensive shortstop and an impressive catching prospect (Ramos) for relief pitchers.

    Am I the only one that thinks this is all backwards!?!

    This has always been abundantly clear in the playoffs and I just don’t think the Twins understand… power-pitching and difference makers at up-the-middle positions push contenders into champions.

    Unless his contract demands are unrealistic, trading Liriano would be a mistake… especially with Bill Smith and the Twins trade mantra facilitating such a deal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: