Scouting Yourself

Carson Cistulli at FanGraphs is exactly what the website needs every now and then. The other writers focus so much on critiquing baseball that Cistulli’s writings are like a breath of fresh air. If you haven’t read his posts, he is essentially a poet (without the rhymes) with words, mixing in humor to create a nice change of lightheartedness from the serious tones of the other writers.* When I see his name prefacing a new post, I immediately know that I’m in for a treat, provided that I’m interested in what he’s talking about.**

* Not that I’m saying that I dislike the other writers. Come on, I quote FanGraphs so often, you’d think it’s my favorite baseball website. Well…it likely is.

** There’s a few times where he’ll start talking about stuff that I know nothing about, which causes me to lose interest immediately. We all know that feeling.

Well, Carson’s latest endeavor starts with a little story about his trip with a handful of other FanGraphs writers to Arizona to see a few spring training games. His time with these guys led him to create scouting reports for all the writers, based on the “5 tools of a sabermetric blogger” (though I feel anyone that has a blog could certainly subject themselves to the scouting reports). Since I’m a guy that loves using numbers, I couldn’t help but try this out myself. Who doesn’t like reflecting on him/herself? First, a primer from Carson:

Number Stuff (NS) – Encompasses a few skills, including: database skills, math skills, player valuation skills, and (duh) nunchuck skills. I call it “stuff,” on account of my own rating in this tool is pretty bad — about a 30 or 35, probably.

Nerd Cred (NC) – Pale skin and glasses are important factors here, as is the possession of an advanced degree or some other nerdy non-baseball specialization.

Baseballing Cred (BC) – A measure of actual baseballing knowledge. A high-ish rating requires not only an encyclopedic knowledge of major leaguers, but also actual knowledge from the various horses’ mouths. For example, if you think Eric Byrnes will get starts against lefties, that’ll net you a 50 rating. If Tony Frigging Blengino tells you that Eric Byrnes will get starts against lefties, that’s closer to a 70 or 75.

Range (RA) – Maybe or maybe not overlapping with Nerd Cred, this measures the blogicator’s comfort in dealing with topics non-baseball. In particular, pop culture references are important here.

Want To (WT) – An assessment of the writer’s industry. Making multiple daily posts — that, or contributing to multiple sources — will help the blogicator’s rating in this category. The WT rating are generally high around here.

For each tool, I use the standard 20-80 scouting scale, a brief explanation of which you can read here via Erik Manning’s Prosect Primer at Future Redbirds:

The 20-80 Scale is a tool that is used to measure various aspects of a given player’s tools. The tools they measure would obviously vary by group. 50 would be considered to be MLB average, while a “plus” tool would be any tool that is graded at 60, and “plus-plus” would be rated 70 or higher.

Now that we know what each of the five tools are, here’s my ratings for myself, with a short explanation why at the end.

NS: 65

NC: 55

BC: 75

RA: 40

WT: 65

I sure hope I rate above-average in NS. I am a math major, after all. NC is a 45 because although I am tall, skinny, and I consider myself to be nerdy (well, actually geeky), I still play many sports, no longer have glasses, and I develop a tan rather easily. I soak up baseball knowledge constantly, so of course my BC would be high, though not a perfect 80 since I know I don’t know everything. RA is below-average because although I can quote many movies and I know a bit about pop culture, I still am behind many of my friends when it comes to reciting the new popular quotes and know what’s going on with the (relatively) new infusion of Disney Channel psuedo-young adults. Lastly, I gave myself a 65 in WT because if I didn’t have homework, I’d be posting stuff here almost once per day. Even with homework, my rates of new posts hovers between once per three days to twice per day.

Now that I’ve rated myself, how do you rate? Don’t turn this into a competition, and be honest. Maybe we can convince TwinsCentric to put these ratings into next year’s Twins Annual.

About these ads

2 Responses to “Scouting Yourself”

  1. Eric Olson Says:

    Lets take a look at this.

    NS – 30. I don’t get much fancier than WPA. Even that’s a big improvement – prior to last season I didn’t even understand how SLG was calculated. I’ve been edumacatin myself.

    NC – 75. I can catch a ball, but I’m not in great shape and I’m currently in law school, which means I wouldn’t have time to tan even if I physically could tan. Oh, and my focus whilst at Gustavus? Theatre technology and formal logic. With a side of political analysis. Geeksnort.

    BC – 55 – I have a whole ton of Twins cred, but sadly my overall baseball cred is sadly lacking. I suppose that’s what growing up in two states without major league teams will do to you.

    RA – 75. I may not follow American Idol, but if you wanna know just about anything else, let me know. Oh, and Kate Winslet and her husband of seven years broke up yesterday, and Heidi Montag is going to be in an Adam Sandler movie. As herself. I consider that fair warning.

    WT – 45. This is tough. I really really want to spend a whole ton of time on Call to the ‘Pen, but law school and graduation and having a wife and dog and needing to sleep three hours a night or more. That, and I can’t give myself too much credit when CTTP has gone dark for extended periods of time at least twice over the two years or so I have been running the site.

    Seem accurate to you?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: